![]() ![]() “Everything was new once,” as wise historians have reminded us. Now wish to protect were, once upon a time, themselves examples of varying degrees of harm - except our predecessors were not soįoolish as to adopt neophobe zealotry as their modus operandi. Conservation has become an irony-free ideology it is impolite to suggest all the buildings we I wish I were making this up, but it is true. ![]() Of heritage consultants, are obliged to prove their proposal will cause “less than substantial harm” and will therefore be OK. Visible from protected conservation areas automatically does “harm.” The client and architect, often, of course, with the help In the U.K., official, government-backed heritage organizations managed to convince legislators that all-new construction in, next to or That is to say, noisy collisions - unexpected, unwanted and damaging. Reaction you might experience from a car crash. When newīuildings are described as having an “impact” on their surroundings, such descriptions often sound like the sort of outcome or Have on a match or game - but in the world of the built environment, the term tends to be seen in largely negative lights. It is not necessarily pejorative - think about the impact a great sporting star may ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |